Jacel Kiram’s Senate bid can’t mention Sabah

Pippa sulu claim 1

Spain agreed to relinquish its territory in Borneo to the British under the Madrid Protocol 1885.

Succeeding Brunei Sultans, said senior Sabah lawyer Amde Sidik, denied that any part of North Borneo was ever given to Sulu. “Only the weight of Sulu tradition supports the claim. The weight of Brunei tradition challenges it.”

Spain agreed to relinquish its territory in Borneo to the British under the Madrid Protocol 1885, he added. “The Protocol found the Sulu Sultanate became defunct when the last Sultan died without leaving a male heir.”

It’s ridiculous to entertain the Sabah claim, said Amde who also heads a think tank, Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis Sabah (PIPPA). “The latest was in 1962 when Sulu ceded sovereignty rights to the Philippines Government.”

“That too is history. The Philippines Government obviously has far more knowledge about the status of the claim than Sulu.”

Amde was commenting on Jacel Kiram’s campaign manifesto on her bid to enter the Philippines Senate. “She claims that she would revive her ancestor’s claim over Sabah if she wins.”

“It does not concern us whether she becomes Senator or otherwise.”

However, he added, harping on “history” which has no relevance was a different matter. “Sulu can’t claim Sabah.”

“Ninety nine per cent of Sabahans are not interested to be ruled by a defunct Sultanate. This must be made known.”

PIPPA, he pledged, was determined to lay the matter to rest once and for all. “We have undertaken extensive studies on this subject.”

“The findings will be made public soon.”

There were so many treaties, as well as overlapping treaties being signed, but only to be revoked soon after they were signed, continued Amde.

Among other writers, said Amde, L R Right in her “The Origin of British Borneo”, said there was considerable doubt on the legitimacy of the Sulu claims. “The claims were in many cases nothing more than legends written down to enhance the status of the ruling house.”

Three weeks before G B Overbeck signed a treaty with Sulu Sultan Jamalulazam on January 22, 1878, he signed an agreement with Sultan Abd Momin of Brunei, said Amde. “Mubin appointed Overbeck as Maharaja Sabah and Raja Gaya and Sandakan on December 29, 1877, an area from Bangi to Sungai Sibuku.”

“Jamalulazam appointed Overbeck as Datuk Bendahara and Raja Sandakan, an area from Kimanis to Sungai Sibuku.”

Forum: “Malaysia Dilemma”

APS Likas Square 2015Forum: “Malaysia Dilemma”

Hosted by Gerakan Perpaduan & Perpaduan Sabah (GPS)

Place: Likas Square, 3rd floor (Peregrine Function Room)
Date: Sunday, 17th of May
Time: 2pm-6pm

Those who will be speaking in the forum are:

-YB Datuk Seri Panglima Wilfred Mojilip Bumburing
-YB Datuk Jeffrey Kitingan
-Datuk Seri Panglima Yong Teck Lee
-Puan Jannie Lasimbang
-2 guests from KL

Issues that will talked about in the forum are:

-RCI
-Borneonisation
-Malaysia Agreement

PIPPA Forum Labuan Part 1 (Video)

Malaysia at Crossroads Part 1

Date: 24th of August 2014

PIPPA (Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis) held a forum at the Mariner Hotel Labuan in Sabah, Malaysia.

The guest speaker for that evening was Malaysian renowned civil liberties activist and former head of MCLM(Malaysia Civil Liberties Movement) & is now head of A.B.U(Anything But UMNO) Mr Haris Ibrahim.

Topics that were touched:
Sabah Oil & Gas, Sabah Poorest State in Malaysia, Questioning the legitimacy of the Najib administration, Racial tension in Malaya.

To keep up to date for more seminars or forums being held by PIPPA come and visit our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/PIPPASabah
https://www.facebook.com/PIPPASabah

Make Sabah, Sarawak Equal Partners to Peninsula: Jeffery

Jeffery equal partners 1

A leading Sabah politician has called for a restructuring of the Federal government to put Sabah, Sarawak on equal footing with Peninsular Malaysia.
State Reform Party (STAR) chief Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan said the Malaysia Agreement 1963 has turned out to be a “takeover” project that has left the Borneo states subservient to Peninsular Malaysia, and robbed them of their wealth and political independence.

“If we were to save Malaysia, we have to restructure (the government). We cannot leave it like it is right now. It is one-sided,” Kitingan told a forum in Kuala Lumpur today.

He said revamping the structure of the Federal government could be done in two ways.

“One option is, Malaya will remain Federation of Malaya. You will have your own states, you will have your own prime minister, and own unitary (central) government.

“Sarawak will have the same thing. All the residencies in Sarawak will become states. And we can create a unitary government (each) in Sabah and Sarawak. They can then have their own prime ministers,” said the Bingkor state assemblyman.

Kitingan said the three central governments could collectively form a new Federal government that would cooperate on national policies, while development issues in each region would be left to each central government.

The new Federal government would be headed by one prime minister, known as the Prime Minister of Malaysia, he added.

“This means we are all in the Federation of Malaysia, but Sabah (and Sarawak) have their own government. Don’t kacau-kacau (disturb) there, we don’t kacau-kacau you here (Peninsular Malaysia),” he said.

“We take care of our own development, but we coordinate on the federal policies.

“This way, everything is fair. Then you retain what the Cobbold Commission Chairman was saying, ‘that you retain your individualities’,” Kitingan said at the forum jointly organised by the Sarawak Association for People’s Aspiration and Borneo Heritage Foundation of Sabah.

Another option, said Kitingan, was to have one elected prime minister and three deputy prime ministers, one from the peninsula, one from Sabah, and one from Sarawak.

He said calls for a review of the Malaysia Agreement 1963, the oil agreement and even for a separation between the peninsula and Borneo states were growing louder.

“Instead of Sabah and Sarawak becoming equal partners to Malaya, we (Borneo) are just rooms in the longhouse of Malaysia. We were downgraded to become the 12th and 13th states. Malaya went up, Sabah and Sarawak stayed down,” said Kitingan.

“We feel we are being recolonised.” June 15, 2014.

Article was made by: Datuk Dr Jeffery Kitingan

Sabah and Sarawak must build strong bond now than ever…

SAB SAR

KOTA KINABALU – Opposition political parties of Sabah based must be seen as one group and one force if it were to win people’s hearts to face the next General Election. Second, the path where the group is heading to must be clearly seen, and the move by Sabah and Sarawak must be in tandem in their demand for full autonomy based on Malaysian Agreement 1963. Thirdly, the networking of the two Borneo States must take place at various levels according Amde Sidik, the Director of PIPPA-Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis Sabah.

In Sarawak’s case the autonomy has been practised slightly ahead of Sabah. Sarawak State is in control of the appointment of its Chief Minister, unlike Sabah where Prime Minister who decides, this is because Sabah is controlled by UMNO, whose chief is the Prime Minister, not only that, every other appointments and policy matters and directions need to have UMNO Chief ‘s blessings.

“Sarawak way would be aspiration for Sabah political movement now. The past and the current Chief Minsters of Sarawak have made it clear time and time again, if the autonomy of the State is to be safeguarded, Peninsula Party in particular UMNO has no place in Sarawak, who else can inspire Sabah better” Amde said.

In the recent two seminars held in Kuching, where two groups of Sabah politicians and NGOs were invited. One, on 26th was organised by Sarawak Sovereignty Movement where three speakers involved, one was Sabah’s politician, one from Sabah’s NGO and a Sarawak academician from International Islamic University who discussed the topic of The Malaysian Agreement 1963, attended by a few federal officers included one from Sabah BN Federal Minister’s representative attended the seminar. Another was on 27th were Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan of the STAR Sabah, Datuk Yong Teck Lee President of SAPP, one Puan Lina Soo from Sarawak NGO and one from Peninsula discussed about the Past, Present and the Future of Malaysia.

There had been great enthusiasm on the autonomy issues in the two separate seminars.

In my observation, its only fair to suggest that cooperation between the two states is a must, and this one of the viable strategists that could be used by the two States Amde Sidik, said

Sarawak would be having its State general election in the 2016, but it doesn’t distract the cooperation.

Sabah must adopt Sarawak’s style, to eliminate any opposition parties, which are not local based. Their promise about autonomy isn’t the same as local parties, and in fact they are only to hijack and confused rural voters.

By Hj Amde Sidik, Director of PIPPA -Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis, Sabah

Esscom Should Zone 1,400KM Coustline Into Manageable Portians

Amde Esscome

By Amde Sidik

ESSCOM- Eastern Sabah Security Command was set up in April 2013 to quelled the rampant activities of kidnappings and abductions along the coastal areas of the East Coast of Sabah.

The Eastern Coastal of Sabah has about 1,400 kilometers long stretching for the district of Kudat to Tawau, in between are Sandakan, Kunak and Lahad Datu

In general, people view ESSCOM has failed to curb the abduction and kidnapping activities. This year alone has three abduction cases. The most recent was on May 6, where Abu Sayyaf kidnapped a Chinese tourist and a Filipino restaurant worker. We are yet to hear the fate of the two victims.

It reminds me less than five years ago Federal Ministers used to make statements that kidnappings and abductions in Eastern Sabah were isolated cases, this agitated local people, wasn’t until Sultan Sulu invaded Sabah last year (March, 2013) otherwise situation wouldn’t change much. The Sultan Sulu invasion was considered weird when authority had to negotiate with terrorists. Why were they negotiating is in anyone guesses.

The same old attitude

Sabah border in the east is porous but it had been nearly the same before independent. Take Tawau for example, people crossing from Indonesia’s Pulau Nyamuk to Tawau requires no inspection.

I was in Cotabato, Mindanao a few years ago when I met one dark skin guy like pirate of the Caribbean who told me he used to visit Sabah many years ago. He said he was a pirate, along their routes to and fro from Malaysia’s water he used to shoot the lights houses and when chase by Malaysian marine they would just cut loose the net that they installed earlier, that marine boat went slower and stalled. That was scary like hell sitting next to him, when I asked what he does now, he replied, he is a good man now he is a pastor. Goddess me!

Living in the East Coast of Sabah according to one respondent who said, he has to endure the scary feeling, until he has enough money to move out from east coast.

The tourism business is worse affected sector in Sabah. Some hotels owners whom I contacted said, in Kota Kinabalu, on average hotel rooms occupancy reduced to about 30 percent, some even experienced 80 percent dropped since this latest abduction.

What is this telling us? The impact of Chinese tourists to Sabah indeed is phenomenal. But people in Peninsula may not feel this because tourists from China came via direct-chartered flights China- Sabah.

But it’s the lackadaisical attitude of political leaders over security problem in Sabah for so long is the most mind-boggling.

Issue on Federal government giving citizenship to Muslims Filipinos from Southern Philippines is not new thing. The just concluded Royal Commission of Inquiry had brought some lights. Generally people can interpret while Tun Mahathir Mohammad, former Prime Minister continues to say what he wanted to say, to fool us, let him be..

Not that many Malays from Peninsula

In the 70s, the statistics of race called Malay in Sabah was only 6 percent but by 2007 it’s more than triple, in some statistics even more. This additional numbers of Malay did not come from Peninsula, records did not show otherwise but must only come from Southern Philippines and Indonesian’s Island, and they are the new Malay. Sabah population now stands at 3.2 million a head of Sarawak 2.47; expert says Sabah population growth was abnormal.

Giving citizenship to Muslim from Southern Philippines would help to prolong the life span of UMNO, United Malay National Organization. Muslims immigrants easily became Malaysia citizens just because they are Muslims. A person owns Malaysian Identify Card is allowed to vote in country’s General Election, it means he is a citizen how he gets MyKad doesn’t matter.

The threat from Southern Philippines is for a long time to come after all the notorious Abu Sayyaf have family connection here and there is no sign of them retiring from doing what they capable of doing.

No need separate agency like ESSCOM

As at present set up ESSCOM needs close coordination with other agencies namely: Police, Army, Marine, political leaders and local leaders, without support from these agencies ESSCOM is powerless.

ESSCOM has neither experience nor expertise by it self, they don’t have manpower on it own.

The creation of ESSCOM is seen as unnecessary because of duplications of work beside, cumbersome networks that then who gives the final say. A former civil servant turns ‘KGB director’ now has to deal with countering terrorists, intruders, kidnapping, subversive activities, intelligent gathering, and etc, in which requiring a completely new skills and new environment altogether.

The scope of police’s work and army’s work could easily be extended to supervise Sabah’s the coastal line. The State security matters should not be made as political trade off. I still consider Sabah Police Chief would be the most appropriate person to head ESSCOM that what he is trained for. In fact a few senior police told me the idea of how to deal with Sabah East coast had been proposed long time ago.

Issue of Control

Control is one of the most important elements here until ESSCOM is in control; we may back to square one. Resources must be made available when required, no time lag, facilities such as high-speed boats, vehicles, weaponry, helicopters and personnel back up system are ever ready.

Outmoded police and army facilities must be replaced. Confident building needs to be emphasized especially with the introduction of the latest technology-this peripherals are a must, but the problem is, terrorists’ speedboats are faster than our police marine. Apart from that intelligent gathering must be sophisticated enough to counter the enemy.

Proposals

Option 1
In my recent discussion with a former Superintendent police who served in Lahad Datu for several years Kamis Daming, and another was Zulkifli Ismail a former Sabah Security Director who said, the most practical thing to do is to break the coastline into manageable parts, for the purpose of this discussion let say, the government builds 5 stations serves as entry in and out points on the coast along the 1,400km, which means one station for every 300 km. These stations are equipped and manned with modern facilities. Logistically sophisticated competent to beat the intruders. Constant observations, monitoring, patrolling, contacts and routine exchanges of security activities with other stations.

Option 2
Let say build 5 platforms, ala oil rags on the sea, for every say 300 km or may be 3 platforms, one platform for every 500 km. The functions of the platforms are the same as stations in mainland mentioned above, except structures of platforms are built on the sea instead of on land.

Impressively built platforms would create tough image and authority means serious business. Equipped with modern security facilities include among them airstrip or landing pad for helicopters. Spending money on facilities like this is more meaningful than buying submarine, which can’t even ‘swim’. Again each of these platforms serves as point of entries

Last but not least, local an orthodox knowledge may still be required I was told mundu (local name for pirates) from Southern Philippines believed in superstition and still very much as part of their culture, they therefore do thing based on what they learnt from their ancestors was discovered by polices over the course of their duties in this region, for example, mundu strikes on certain organised timeframe they do it based on their beliefs, meaning, they don’t strike rampantly but calculative about the date, time or even places. May be with this knowledge would help security officers to take extra measures what part of the year would mundu likely strike sound more like 1bomoh

Amde Sidik is Director of PIPPA [Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis, Sabah] Former lecturer in law, and International Institutions & Political Environment at local and foreign Universities.

Sabah and Sarawak must build strong bond now than ever…

Sabah and Sarawak must build strong bond now than ever...

Kota Kinabalu; 20/05/2014 (Tuesday) Opposition political parties of Sabah based must be seen as one group and one force if it were to win people’s hearts to face the next General Election. Second, the path where the group is heading to must be clearly seen, and the move by Sabah and Sarawak must be in tandem in their demand for full autonomy based on Malaysian Agreement 1963. Thirdly, the networking of the two Borneo States must take place at various levels according Amde Sidik, the Director of PIPPA-Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis Sabah.

In Sarawak’s case the autonomy has been practised slightly ahead of Sabah. Sarawak State is in control of the appointment of its Chief Minister, unlike Sabah where Prime Minister who decides, this is because Sabah is controlled by UMNO, whose chief is the Prime Minister, not only that, every other appointments and policy matters and directions need to have UMNO Chief ‘s blessings.

“Sarawak way would be aspiration for Sabah political movement now. The past and the current Chief Minsters of Sarawak have made it clear time and time again, if the autonomy of the State is to be safeguarded, Peninsula Party in particular UMNO has no place in Sarawak, who else can inspire Sabah better” Amde said.

In the recent two seminars held in Kuching, where two groups of Sabah politicians and NGOs were invited. One, on 26th was organised by Sarawak Sovereignty Movement where three speakers involved, one was Sabah’s politician, one from Sabah’s NGO and a Sarawak academician from International Islamic University who discussed the topic of The Malaysian Agreement 1963, attended by a few federal officers included one from Sabah BN Federal Minister’s representative attended the seminar. Another was on 27th were Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan of the STAR Sabah, Datuk Yong Teck Lee President of SAPP, one Puan Lina Soo from Sarawak NGO and one from Peninsula discussed about the Past, Present and the Future of Malaysia.

There had been great enthusiasm on the autonomy issues in the two separate seminars.

In my observation, its only fair to suggest that cooperation between the two states is a must, and this one of the viable strategists that could be used by the two States Amde Sidik, said

Sarawak would be having its State general election in the 2016, but it doesn’t distract the cooperation.

Sabah must adopt Sarawak’s style, to eliminate any opposition parties, which are not local based. Their promise about autonomy isn’t the same as local parties, and in fact they are only to hijack and confused rural voters.

___________________

Amde Sidik is Director of PIPPA -Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis, Sabah

Religious extremism: View of an East Malaysian Muslim

Religious extremism: View of an East Malaysian Muslim

By Amde Sidik

MAY 15, 2014

The recent upsurge of religious extremists movement in Malaysia looks like planned and strategised in subtle way, and one wonders if the country is turning into a breeding ground for the groups.

Religious extremists boast their struggles using NGOs as shields, under the pretext of “Islamic struggles”. Ordinary citizens, especially non-Muslims, feel intimidated by their extreme, sometimes seditious remarks, which makes walking on Malaysian streets uncomfortable. The media too can be blamed for their aptness in sensationalising the issue of race and religions. Had they not given coverage, there is no way they could be where they are now.

When we talk about religion, there is a different perception among people in Sabah compared with Malaysians in the peninsula. Majority of Sabahans don’t share sympathy about the plight of Muslims from southern Philippines as they had experienced hell for the last fifty years or so, no matter what Tun Dr Mahathir said on the Project M.

Labour might be cheap because of their presence but the overall quality of life of Malaysians has declined, because those who migrated to Sabah were poorer than Sabahans, some were even criminals or escapees from prisons.
The biggest threat now economically in Sabah is not the Filipinos but those newly arrived from Celebes Island. There are 17 million in the crowded Celebes Island who look at Sabah as gold mine.

My point is that Malaysia’s religious extremists are all based in the peninsula, at the very nose of the people in power, and as such there is this suspicion for their inaction. We notice many extremists were the offshoots of Umno, which is why they are untouchable, such as Ibrahim Ali, the president of Perkasa.

We have heard such statements as “if you don’t like Malaysia go back to China” or “go back to India” or wherever. This kind of saying hurts. Malaysians in Sabah don’t share this view and can’t stomach it. Religion isn’t the only line of connection. Blood connection has always been thicker here. I have in fact written this phrase time and times again, as a Muslim I am disgusted because of the behaviour of my fellow Muslims.

If they, the extremists in the peninsula, can say to their neighbours next door, what about us, who are thousand miles away and as such so much less significant to them. Only a matter of time this same people would tell us to go back to Borneo. If that is the case, we ought to be thinking of doing something before it’s too late.

Among the most notable leaders now is a Muslim educated from a reputable Islamic institution Al Azhar University, Abdullah Zaik Abd Rahman, who has been behaving like a graduate of Boko Haram. But of course Egypt is no longer a suitable place to seek knowledge. I wouldn’t recommend. Malaysia should stop sending students to this part of the world. If the taste of pudding is in the eating, then we have had it. Don’t waste public money. If patriotism is what the government is for, they may not getting it all. Instead, some came back as religious bigots.

This reminds me of a TV discussion a few years back on why Christians in East Malaysia can use the word “Allah” but not in West Malaysia. The answer from one NGO leader was that it’s all right for East Malaysia to use “Allah”, but it is not proper for Muslims in West Malaysia to allow Christians to use it. When asked why, he simply said, “Not proper”. My question: Is he implying that Muslims in Sabah and Sarawak are not proper? – May 15, 2014.

* Amde Sidik is director of Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis, Sabah.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Article from: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/sideviews/article/religious-extremism-view-of-an-east-malaysian-muslim-amde-sidik

On The Rights To Secede

By Amde Sidik

MAY 11, 2014 

Kota Sentosa assemblyman Chong Chieng Jen recently told the Sarawak Assembly that if a referendum to decide whether Sarawak should remain in Malaysia were held today, 75% of Sarawakians would opt for separation.

That prompted this writer – the director of Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis Sabah – to refer to his “What do we mean by autonomy?” presented at the “Malaysia Agreement 1963” seminar  held in Kuching on April 26 and organised by the Sarawak Sovereignty Movement, chaired by Datuk Morshidi Abd Rahman, who is also SSM chairman.

How secession can be made and in the context of Malaysia?

But today, no country can intimidate its citizens forever.

In Malaysia, the word “autonomy” has never been said openly until SAPP leaders did in November 2010, on the eve of the Batu Sapi, Sandakan by-election.

SAPP was accused of wanting to pull out of Malaysia. Voters were scared. The result was predictable. But now Sarawak is talking about separating from the Federation of Malaysia – which is another step above autonomy.

According to Amde, with the current political scenario in Malaysia, there are three options available for the Borneo states.

One, proceed with the current political system, where nothing is changed.

Two, demand for autonomy, because that is our legal rights under Malaysia Agreement 1963, that is, restore the agreement because that is what the people expect.

Third, secede from Malaysia.

Only recently the Urban Wellbeing, Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Abd Rahman Dahlan said Sabah and Sarawak could not secede from the federation.

But as Amde pointed out in Article 2 of the Federal Constitution, there is no mention of secession, but that doesn’t mean you can secede, which is not unusual in legal interpretation of English law.

The general concept is if one voluntarily on one’s free will joins an association, it is assumed it is also one’s free will to leave.

International law experts have no problem in agreeing with this.

There are two main United Nations bodies that are concerned with secession – International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICCPR and International Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ICESCR.

Take Somalia as an example. Other legal theorist like Allen Buchanan says secession is allowed:  a state can secede for any reasons, only if there are grave injustices or both.

* Amde Sidik is director of PIPPA (Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis, Sabah).

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

 

From: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/sideviews/article/on-the-rights-to-secede-amde-sidik

Sabah leaders, reps must reclaim rights

Sabah leaders, reps must reclaim rights

Don’t expect federal leaders to raise issues concerning Sabah and Sarawak considering all that they have already done, said a Sabah NGO.

KOTA KINABALU: Progressive Institute of Public Policy Analysis, Sabah (PIPPA) has called on policy makers both from the ruling coalition and the opposition, to reclaim the state’s ownership of oil and gas resources.

It urged this in a paper distributed by its members to the various policy makers, including the chief minister Musa Aman, Speaker of the State Legislative Assembly Salleh Said Keruak, deputy chief minister Joseph Pairin Kitingan and Lajim Ukin, the Sabah opposition leader, at the State Legislative Assembly Building, yesterday.

PIPPA director Amde Sidek said such a move is appropriate and necessary in view of the fact that the Emergency Law had been lifted on Nov 24, 2011, thus rendering the Petroleum Development Act 1974 null and void.

He explained that the Federal Government took ownership of Sabah and Sarawak Territorial Waters by virtue of the emergency law declared on the May 15 1969 under article 150 of Federal Constitution.

Parliament was suspended and reconvened only on 20 February, 1971.

Between 1969 and 1971 a number of laws were created, among them, three laws that transferred the ownership of Sabah and Sarawak Territorial Waters to the Federal Government as follows:

i. Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance No.7 1969 [P.U. (A) 307A/1969] enacted 2 August 1969 and came into force 10August 1969.

ii. The Continental Shelf Act 1966;

iii. The Petroleum Mining Act 1966

Ordinance No 7, 1969 limits the State’s territorial waters to three nautical miles including Sabah and Sarawak.

When it was passed in 1966, it could not be applied in Sabah and Sarawak without the consent of the respective States Government.

The two Acts only came into force for Sabah and Sarawak after it was gazetted as P.U. (A) 467/1969 Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance No 10 of 1969 dated Nov 8, 1969.
Two years and only silence

The abolishment of the emergency law was announced by the Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, on Nov 24, 2011, by virtue of article 150 (7) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

“This article says, all laws made during the emergency, once the six months has lapsed after the proclamation of lifting is announced, are no longer valid but void. The sixth month fell on the 24 May 2012.

“Hence, by the operation of law, a body like Petronas no longer has the right to operate, sign contract, explore and so on. The rightful owner is the state government.

“Unfortunately, after 24 months have lapsed since PM lifted the emergency law, our Sabah lawmakers are still keeping quiet about it, which is unbecoming of a wakil rakyat (elected representative).

“We would not expect federal leaders to raise the issue after all what they did to Sabah and Sarawak.

“We therefore urge all wakil rakyat to take cognition to the rights of the state and the right of the people.

“We hope with the papers we present today (yesterday) would enable them to understand what does the lifting of the emergency law means to Sabah, especially its rights to oil and gas resources.

“PIPPA is ever-ready to assist to make our policy makers and the people in general to understand with regards to the issue,” Amde explained.

He also noted that after receiving the papers distributed by PIPPA, Salleh had responded by promising to look into the matter.

Among the key PIPPA members present to distribute the papers were its chief researcher Zainal Ajamain, and James Ligunjang, besides Amde.

Free Malaysia Today – April 15, 2014